☰
✕

Constitution: As A Living Document
Question
Wired Faculty App

From the information that many amendments were made during 2000-2003, which of the following conclusions would you draw?


  • Judiciary did not interfere in the amendments made during this period.

  • One political party had a strong majority during this period.

  • There was a strong pressure from the public in favour of certain amendments.

  • There were no real differences among the parties during this time.

  • There were no real differences among the parties during this time.

Answer

C.

There was a strong pressure from the public in favour of certain amendments.

D.

There were no real differences among the parties during this time.

E.

The amendments were of a non-controversial nature and parties had an agreement on the subject of amendments.

Sponsor Area

Some More Questions From Constitution: As A Living Document Chapter

How many times the former Soviet Union had formal new constitutions? What is the present position of Russia in this regard?

Is it true that the good Indians have intended a very good and suitable constitution? Mention only two points to prove goodness of our country's constitution.

How far is it true that Sovereignty of the people is the basis of the constitutional amendment procedure?

Who can amend the constitution? How can it do this? Mention the three provisions in this regard.

Write a brief note on “unity and integrity of the nation,” as given in the Indian Constitution.

Explain the term fraternity.

What is meant by the term 'Republic' as given in the Preamble of Indian Constitution?

Write a short note on the word ‘Democratic’ used in the Preamble of Indian Constitution.

Briefly describe the constitutional development in France.

What is the significance of the following phrases as used in the Preamble of the Indian Constitution: “Liberty of thought, expression, belief, religion and worship.”