Look at the wordings of the two documents given below. The first column is from the 1990 Nepal Constitution. The second column is from the more recent Interim Constitution of Nepal.

1990 Constitution of Nepal Part 7: Executive	2007 Interim Constitution Part 5: Executive
Article 35: Executive power: The executive power of the kingdom of Nepal shall be exercised exclusively by His Majesty.	• The executive power of Nepal shall, pursuant to this Constitution and other laws, be vested in the Council of Ministers. • The executive junctions of Nepal shall be taken in the name of the Prime Minister.

What is the difference in who exercises ‘Executive Power’ in the above two Constitutions of Nepal? Keeping this in mind, why do you think Nepal needs a new Constitution today?