“Some scholars see partition as a culmination of communal politics.” Examine the statement.

Some scholars see partition as a culmination of a communal politics that started developing in the opening decades of the twentieth century. They support that separate electorates for Muslims, created by the colonial government in 1909 and expanded in 1919, crucially shaped the nature of communal politics.
Separate electorates meant that Muslims could now elect their own representative in designated constituencies. This created a temptation for politicians working within this system to use sectarian slogans and gather a following by distributing favours to their own religious groups. Religious identities thus acquired a functional use within a modern political system and the logic of electoral politics deepened and hardened these identities.
Community identities no longer indicated simple difference in faith and belief; they came to mean active oppression and hostility between communities. However, while separate electorate did have a profound impact on Indian politics, we should be careful not to over emphasize their significance or to see partition as a logical outcome of their working.