The Judiciary

Sponsor Area

Question
ICSEENIPO12030296

What is the mode of appointment of judges in the apex courts of: a. India b. UK

Solution

i. The Constitution of India lays down that the President shall, in consultation with such of the Judges of the Supreme Court and of the High Courts in the States as the President may deem necessary, appoint the Judges to the concerned Court.

ii. The Prime Minister shall recommend the names to the Queen. But this shall be preceded by an elaborate process conducted by a selection commission. The commission shall consist of five members consisting of the President and Deputy President of the Supreme Court and representatives of the Judicial Appointments Commission. The process involves the mandatory consultation with the senior Judges, the Lord Chancellor and the devolved executives.

Sponsor Area

Question
ICSEENIPO12030310

Discuss the conditions essential to ensure the independence of judiciary. 

Solution

Independence of Judiciary:
i. Separation of Judiciary from the Executive and Legislature: Judiciary in India is neither a branch of the executive nor a hand-maid of the legislature. It has an independent identity under the Constitution. It enjoys full autonomy in its working.

ii. Appointment of Judges by the President: The method of appointment of judges should be very sound. The Judges of the Supreme Court and High Courts should be appointed by the President. While appointing other judges the Supreme Court, the President consults the Chief Justice of India. In case of the appointment of the Chief Justice, the practice of appointing the senior most judges to this high office is followed. In the case of subordinate courts, the Judges are recruited through competitive examinations.

iii. High Qualifications: The Constitution prescribes specific and high qualifications for the Judges. A person eligible for judgeship has to be an Indian citizen, must have experience as a Judge of a High Court for at least five years or as an advocate of High Court for at least ten years or be a distinguished jurist. Thus, only persons with high qualifications and experience are appointed as judges of the courts.

iv. Long Tenure: Judges of Supreme Court remain in office till they attain the age of 65 years. This age limit ensures a long tenure for the Judges.

v. Security of Service: The Judges should enjoy good security of service. No judge can be removed from the office except by a very difficult process of impeachment.

vi. High Salary: Every Judge of the Supreme Court should get a high salary. Besides this, each judge is entitled to free residential accommodation, medical allowance and several other perks. Salaries and allowances of judges cannot be reduced during their terms of office, except in the situation of a financial emergency in the country.

vii. Prohibition of Practice after Retirement: A Judge of the Supreme Court should be prohibited to practice before any court or authority in India.

viii. Power to Punish the Contempt of Court: Courts should be given the power to punish all cases involving a contempt of court. The Supreme Court can punish any institution or person who is found guilty of contempt of court.

Question
ICSEENIPO12030311

Explain the original, appellate and advisory functions of the Supreme Court of India. 

Solution

The jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is divided into three categories:

i. Original - In its original jurisdiction the Supreme Court acts as the guardian and protector of the constitution. The Supreme Court has exclusive jurisdiction in case of (a) Union vs. one or more States (b) Union and one or more State vs. one or more States (c) One or more States vs. one or more States.

ii. Appellate - Appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court extends to both civil and criminal cases. As the highest court of the country appeals in all such cases from the High Court lie with the Supreme Court. In a civil case if the High Court certifies that the case has constitutional significance or that the case is fit for appeal to the Supreme Court, the court hears appeal from the judgment of the High Court.

In a criminal case, appeals may be made to the Supreme Court if (1) the High Court reverses acquittal by a lower court and award death sentence in a case or if (2) the High Court certifies that the case is fit for appeal to the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court also has a Writ jurisdiction. It issues writs in the nature of habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, certiorari and quo-warranto in enforcement of fundamental rights granted in chapter III of the constitution. However, this jurisdiction is not exclusive. High Court also enjoys this jurisdiction.
iii. Advisory - The Supreme Court has an Advisory jurisdiction. Artcile 143 empower the President to seek the Court’s advisory opinion on any question of law or fact. Such advice however is not binding on the President.

Question
ICSEENIPO12030318

Why is the existence of a Supreme Court a necessity in a federation? 

Solution

It is necessary because judicial review can be conducted by the Supreme Court in respect of all Central and State laws, the orders and ordinances of the executive and constitutional amendments.